[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gallery-devel
Subject:    Re: [Gallery-devel] Use of PEAR classes in G1
From:       Beckett Madden-Woods <beckett () beckettmw ! com>
Date:       2005-03-28 14:17:48
Message-ID: 20050328141748.GA27473 () beckettmw ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 08:23:14PM -0800, Bharat Mediratta wrote:

> Don Willingham wrote:
> >I have an IPTC patch that depends on PEAR code.  I was waiting until 1.5
> >was out the door before introducing the code.  I coded it to have a
> >config wizard option to specify the path to the PEAR IPTC code.  I
> >figured it was similar enough to netpbm, imagemagick, and jhead
> >binaries.  Why should it matter if it is a script.

My old attempt at G2 IPTC code (currently being worked on by xlerb)
also depended on the same PEAR IPTC code, but it's just a tiny
one-file script (just wrappers for built-in PHP functions). In that
case, I had just made a modules/iptc/lib directory and put the file in
there, and envisioned it as just being shipped along with everything
else.

I imagine we could have the same approach here and just include it,
since it's so small. If you ever start increasing the amount of
external PEAR code used to lots of other packages, then you could
always pack up a version without it.

-BMW


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
__[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________

[ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
[ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]