[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fwts-devel
Subject:    Re: MCFG test in fwts
From:       ivanhu <ivan.hu () canonical ! com>
Date:       2015-03-25 3:41:16
Message-ID: 55122E5C.1070801 () canonical ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think it might be more flexible for user and developer, if we keep the 
acpitables do the simple sanity checking for ACPI tables.
And put the further test of ACPI tables stand-along, since some 
tables(MCFG, DMAR...) are not defined in ACPI spec.

Cheers,
Ivan


On 2015年03月24日 23:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 24/03/15 15:32, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Due to "historical" implementation reasons (e.g. I messed up), we have a
>> MCFG test on its own, and also a MCFG stub that does not a lot in the
>> "acpitables" test.
>>
>> Should we keep the MCFG stand-alone test and remove the stub from the
>> acpitables test, or should we integrate the MCFG test into the
>> acpitables?  As it stands, it is a bit confusing and needs some attention.
>>
>> Colin
>>
> BTW, I've filed a bug for this issue so we don't lose it:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwts/+bug/1433603
>


-- 
fwts-devel mailing list
fwts-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/fwts-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]