[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: full-disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] SSL Capable NetCat and more
From: "-= Glowing Doom =-" <secn3t () gmail ! com>
Date: 2011-03-31 4:00:01
Message-ID: AANLkTiki=rFjshK1ioOXRWAoOUC=kURQozx_Z2fQ2V3S () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
err typo on the first line 'cryptcat' is tool i mean... an offcut of
netcat...yes,it supports encrypted /invisible connections... or so i
believe....
On 31 March 2011 14:53, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t@gmail.com> wrote:
> duhhh ever heard of a tool called 'sryptcat ala cc'... god what a joke of a
> post.,...
> find your tools, dont remake the wheel, and usually, that gets remade
> badkly! use cryptcat if you are going to be whacking... bloody hell!
> grow some brain and stop propping a shitty app wich has been DONE!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> XD / HaqNET !
>
>
>
> On 31 March 2011 14:28, Randal T. Rioux <randy@procyonlabs.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/27/2011 4:29 PM, Dan Tulovsky wrote:
>> >> Beside that, scnc is written in pure-Perl, and is easily modifiable
>> >> by anyone. Such really simple (dumb?) stuff should not be written in
>> >> low-level languages such as C.
>> >
>> > You can't be serious...
>>
>> Shirley, he is.
>>
>> Perl is shite. It's a dependency hell, it lacks the "logic" of C/C++ and
>> is interpreted (as pointed out by others). Any code base can be
>> modifiable by anyone - as long as it is open sourced.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing the product. I think reinventing
>> the wheel in lesser performing methods is great. Just don't disregard C.
>> To be honest, in my code auditing days, it was SO much easier to find
>> flaws in C/C++ than Perl, because Perl is just messy and ugly. Something
>> looks wrong, but it's right. Uggh!
>>
>> But if you need to write something quick for an easy task, by all means,
>> hit the Perl.
>>
>> It's like using Java to write large scale enterprise products. Who the
>> hell? Why? Portability is nice, but performance is better. Java belongs
>> in the small-scale realm of applications.
>>
>> Grumble grumble. Get off my lawn. Back to the lair :-)
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
err typo on the first line 'cryptcat' is tool i mean... an offcut of netcat...yes,it \
supports encrypted /invisible connections... or so i believe....<br><br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On 31 March 2011 14:53, -= Glowing Doom =- <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:secn3t@gmail.com">secn3t@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); padding-left: 1ex;">duhhh ever heard of a tool called 'sryptcat ala cc'... god \
what a joke of a post.,...<br> find your tools, dont remake the wheel, and usually, that gets \
remade badkly! use cryptcat if you are going to be whacking... bloody hell!<br> grow some brain \
and stop propping a shitty app wich has been \
DONE!<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>XD \
/ HaqNET !<div><div></div><div class="h5"> <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On 31 March 2011 14:28, Randal T. Rioux <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:randy@procyonlabs.com" target="_blank">randy@procyonlabs.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px \
solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On 3/27/2011 4:29 PM, Dan Tulovsky wrote:<br>
>> Beside that, scnc is written in pure-Perl, and is easily modifiable<br>
>> by anyone. Such really simple (dumb?) stuff should not be written in<br>
>> low-level languages such as C.<br>
><br>
> You can't be serious...<br>
<br>
Shirley, he is.<br>
<br>
Perl is shite. It's a dependency hell, it lacks the "logic" of C/C++ and<br>
is interpreted (as pointed out by others). Any code base can be<br>
modifiable by anyone - as long as it is open sourced.<br>
<br>
Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing the product. I think reinventing<br>
the wheel in lesser performing methods is great. Just don't disregard C.<br>
To be honest, in my code auditing days, it was SO much easier to find<br>
flaws in C/C++ than Perl, because Perl is just messy and ugly. Something<br>
looks wrong, but it's right. Uggh!<br>
<br>
But if you need to write something quick for an easy task, by all means,<br>
hit the Perl.<br>
<br>
It's like using Java to write large scale enterprise products. Who the<br>
hell? Why? Portability is nice, but performance is better. Java belongs<br>
in the small-scale realm of applications.<br>
<br>
Grumble grumble. Get off my lawn. Back to the lair :-)<br>
<br>
Randy<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<br>
Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html" \
target="_blank">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><br> Hosted and \
sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/" \
target="_blank">http://secunia.com/</a><br> </blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic