[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       full-disclosure
Subject:    Re: [COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC NOW] RE: [Full-disclosure] complaints about
From:       Josh Restivo <jrestivo () inventhorizons ! com>
Date:       2005-12-30 5:34:12
Message-ID: 200512292334.12525.jrestivo () inventhorizons ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 29 December 2005 22:21, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Pete Simpson wrote:
> 
> > Some facts and logic may prove useful.
> 
> Agreed: we're still waiting for some...

Devolution into a bottomless cesspool of contrived and meandering arguments is 
a painful (okay, perhaps occasionally amusing) spectacle to behold. But, to 
witness arguments brazenly concocted of baseless assertions on a*technical* 
list is genuinely pathetic.

Paul, Pete, et. al, if you feel compelled to proffer anything remotely 
non-obvious as a fact in this and similar forums, at least have the decency 
(excepting the existence of a pre-existing independent referable source) to 
fire up vi, wordpad, etc... and slap together a QAD web page purporting to 
verify said 'facts' which you may then refer to. Besides, citations and 
references (even when entirely bogus) make you look all cool and 
scholarly-like. 

For those of us so inclined, we also then have the opportunity to reasonably 
consider your argument. 

Otherwise, STFU. 

-josh
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]