[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freetype-devel
Subject:    Re: [ft-devel] [ft] Announcing FreeType 2.8.1
From:       J Decker <d3ck0r () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-09-20 19:00:54
Message-ID: CAA2GJqVZp8E3TeDBY_1LVQ-5K9nXguhu6MFfNKrr4nqNgRCukA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> > I guess CMakeLists.txt isn't really used by anyone?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that these are missing from the latest.
> >
> >   src/otvalid/otvalid.c
> >   src/gxvalid/gxvmod.c
>
> No, they are not missing.  Leaving out those two components is
> intentional; they are rarely used and would increase the library size
> unnecessarily.
>
> > (I have my own version I keep updated)
>
> Maybe it makes sense to prepare addition of those two files, with a
> proper comment why they aren't included by default.  Or maybe there is
> a more `cmake'-like solution for including the two files
> conditionally?  I'm not a cmake user, so any help is welcomed!
>
> Okay, I had wondered if they were meant to be only optional...
 when building on centos system it complained about missing
otc_module_somehting and gxv_class_module(something).  adding those made it
work... I'll dig into it some more.. it only gave the .so name, not the
module in the .so that had the issue.  (I didn't have the issue on windows
or Arch linux)


>
>     Werner
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep \
20, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Werner LEMBERG <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:wl@gnu.org" \
target="_blank">wl@gnu.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span \
class=""><br> &gt; I guess CMakeLists.txt isn&#39;t really used by anyone?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I&#39;m pretty sure that these are missing from the latest.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;     src/otvalid/otvalid.c<br>
&gt;     src/gxvalid/gxvmod.c<br>
<br>
</span>No, they are not missing.   Leaving out those two components is<br>
intentional; they are rarely used and would increase the library size<br>
unnecessarily.<br>
<span class=""><br>
&gt; (I have my own version I keep updated)<br>
<br>
</span>Maybe it makes sense to prepare addition of those two files, with a<br>
proper comment why they aren&#39;t included by default.   Or maybe there is<br>
a more `cmake&#39;-like solution for including the two files<br>
conditionally?   I&#39;m not a cmake user, so any help is welcomed!<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div>Okay, \
I had wondered if they were meant to be only optional...</div><div>  when building on \
centos system it complained about missing otc_module_somehting and \
gxv_class_module(something).   adding those made it work... I&#39;ll dig into it some \
more.. it only gave the .so name, not the module in the .so that had the issue.   (I \
didn&#39;t have the issue on windows or Arch linux)</div><div>  </div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"> <br>
      Werner<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>



_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]