[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freetype-devel
Subject:    Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd
From:       Werner LEMBERG <wl () gnu ! org>
Date:       2010-10-26 6:05:56
Message-ID: 20101026.080556.23489448.wl () gnu ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

>> I also consider conic0.png to be slightly better (I did the blind
>> test *before* reading Werner's response).
> 
> Yes, conic0 == 2.4.3, conic_0 == HEAD
> The attached is hinted rendering now.
> Look for differences between e's and o's.

The most notable difference is the rendering of `s' IMHO (e.g. at
23 ppem).  hinted_conic.png is much better; in this image, it's no
longer a personal opinion...

How shall we proceed?


    Werner

_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]