[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freetype-devel
Subject:    Re: [Devel] Reserved FT_VALIDATE_*
From:       Masatake YAMATO <jet () gyve ! org>
Date:       2004-12-08 7:59:52
Message-ID: 20041208.165952.206648737.jet () gyve ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

> [Masatake-san, your mail was in the queue -- please check your
>  subscription status!  Maybe our buggy mailman has kicked you out
>  somehow.]
Strange. I've just re-subscribe it.

> > #define FT_VALIDATE_BASE  0x0100
> > #define FT_VALIDATE_GDEF  0x0200
> > #define FT_VALIDATE_GPOS  0x0400
> > #define FT_VALIDATE_GSUB  0x0800
> > #define FT_VALIDATE_JSTF  0x1000
> >
> > I wonder why FT_VALIDATE_* are not started from 0x0001.
> 
> IIRC, it was just to make the values distinct from the internal
> FT_ValidationLevel enumerations (like FT_VALIDATE_DEFAULT=0).
> 
> > I wonder which number I should use for FT_VALIDATE_mort.
> 
> I suggest 0x2000.
 
I see.
Thank you.

Masatake YAMATO

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@freetype.org
http://www.freetype.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]