[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freetds
Subject: Re: ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH]
From: Peter Harvey <pharvey () codebydesign ! com>
Date: 2003-03-02 23:03:17
[Download RAW message or body]
> As we discussed in this forum a few weeks ago, some driver managers
> rely exclusively (and erroneously) on link-time information about
> what functions are available in the driver. IIRC, iODBC falls in
> this category and unixODBC does not. Since iODBC has not, as far as
> I know, been ported to VMS, and unixODBC does not have the problem,
> the main advantage to limiting the export list doesn't seem overly
> compelling. Are there other advantages?
I am all for the standard whenever it makes sense and sometimes - even
when it does not (i.e. just because it can be relied upon to perform a
certian way). My 2 cents.
Peter
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic