[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeswitch-dev
Subject:    Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH/Verto kicking ass, 61 simultaneous feeds
From:       Michael Jerris <mike () jerris ! com>
Date:       2016-09-30 4:04:02
Message-ID: 8C00F00B-E9FD-4F7A-BA3F-4A13BC0EAA1B () jerris ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Thats about the number we maxed out on, but it wasn't that formal of a test, and \
whats using webrtc, was just a stress test on conference to find breaking points.  \
I'd like to see more info on the verto web socket breaking points if you could switch \
it to just audio and see if you can still see that break?


> On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:18 PM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com> wrote:
> 
> Just finished a test where I got 61 simultaneous users into a FreeSWITCH \
> videoconference via Chrome/mod_verto. 
> Here's a link to a youtube video of a portion of the test: \
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0kgb1zNxMU \
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0kgb1zNxMU> 
> Some stats for those interested:
> 
> FreeSWITCH box:
> 61 simultaneous WebRTC video feeds via Chrome/Verto
> Conference configured to minimize outbound encoding
> 32 core Xeon E5-2650, 32GB RAM
> Load average seemed to peak around 16
> 
> Test users:
> 10 Headless Ubuntu test servers, 20 cores / 8GB RAM each
> Each box running 6 Chrome instances via Selenium
> 
> The video quality was a tad blurry, not sure if that was something on my end or the \
> muxing end of things. Also, I had to put the users in 12 at a time, as I've found \
> that too many joining at once is causing websocket disconnects, not sure what the \
> deal is there yet. 
> Curious if anyone else is trying crazy stuff like this, or if I've just set some \
> sort of record. :P


[Attachment #5 (unknown)]

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html \
charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; \
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Thats about the number we maxed out \
on, but it wasn't that formal of a test, and whats using webrtc, was just a stress \
test on conference to find breaking points. &nbsp;I'd like to see more info on the \
verto web socket breaking points if you could switch it to just audio and see if you \
can still see that break?<div class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br \
class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 29, 2016, at \
11:18 PM, Chad Phillips &lt;<a href="mailto:chad@apartmentlines.com" \
class="">chad@apartmentlines.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br \
class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><span \
style="font-size:13px" class="">Just finished a test where I got 61 simultaneous \
users into a FreeSWITCH videoconference via Chrome/mod_verto.</span><div \
style="font-size:13px" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-size:13px" \
class="">Here's a link to a youtube video of a portion of the test:&nbsp;<a \
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0kgb1zNxMU" target="_blank" \
class="">https://www.youtube.com/<wbr class="">watch?v=c0kgb1zNxMU</a></div><div \
style="font-size:13px" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-size:13px" \
class="">Some stats for those interested:</div><div style="font-size:13px" \
class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-size:13px" class=""><div \
class="">FreeSWITCH box:</div><div class="">61 simultaneous WebRTC video feeds via \
Chrome/Verto</div><div class="">Conference configured to minimize outbound \
encoding</div><div class="">32 core Xeon E5-2650, 32GB RAM</div><div class="">Load \
average seemed to peak around 16</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div \
class="">Test users:</div><div class="">10 Headless Ubuntu test servers, 20 cores / \
8GB RAM each</div><div class="">Each box running 6 Chrome instances via \
Selenium</div></div><div style="font-size:13px" class=""><br class=""></div><div \
style="font-size:13px" class="">The video quality was a tad blurry, not sure if that \
was something on my end or the muxing end of things. Also, I had to put the users in \
12 at a time, as I've found that too many joining at once is causing websocket \
disconnects, not sure what the deal is there yet.</div><div style="font-size:13px" \
class=""><br class=""></div><div style="font-size:13px" class="">Curious if anyone \
else is trying crazy stuff like this, or if I've just set some sort of record. \
:P</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>



_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic