[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeradius-users
Subject:    Re: Vendor-Specific attribute with rlm_rest
From:       Bjørn_Mork <bjorn () mork ! no>
Date:       2020-05-08 8:13:52
Message-ID: 87imh6g7y7.fsf () miraculix ! mork ! no
[Download RAW message or body]

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> writes:

> On May 7, 2020, at 4:42 PM, Michael A Carpenter - macarpen@us.ibm.com \
> <macarpen@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > The former, vendor is SuperMicro
> > ..
> > I arrived at those values based on \
> > http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2017-November/089770.html \
> > and https://www.supermicro.com/support/faqs/faq.cfm?faq=22374
> 
> Arg.  I hate this kind of nonsense.  It's not like the specs have been *perfectly \
> clear* since 1996 or so.  :(

One might consider nonsense docs a feature when it comes to IPMI :)

The faq should probably link to this video instead:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZeUntdObCA

It goes into far more details on IPMI user-authentication than the
SuperMicro manual, so it is almost on-topic here.  And it will probably
make you reconsider whether RADIUS authentication is worth it at all in
this case.

There is also a nice transcript at https://lwn.net/Articles/630778/ But
I recommend spending the time to view Matthew's presentation.  With some
popcorn.  He is really entertaining, as usual.


Bjørn


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]