[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeradius-users
Subject:    Re: State of RadSec in FR 3.0.10
From:       Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn () uni-koeln ! de>
Date:       2015-11-24 16:43:40
Message-ID: 5CB5EC7E005FF5CF2A2AAFF9 () tyrion ! rrz ! uni-koeln ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


--On 24. November 2015 um 10:50:33 -0500 Alan DeKok 
<aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:

>> But our national Eduroam center (DFN) recommends using radsecproxy
>> instead, because according to them RadSec isn't yet stable in FR 3.0.
>> What's your take on that? To be honest, I'd rather help fix problems in
>> FR's RadSec implementation than install another piece of software -
>> unless you recommend against it.
>
>   RedSec is stable in 3.0.10.

Thanks, that's what I thought. Unless DFN put their foot down and won't 
allow us to us it, I will give it a try.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]