[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeradius-users
Subject:    Re: Advice needed (Acct-Session-Id vs. User-Name)
From:       "Kyriaki Gali" <kgal () kinetix ! gr>
Date:       2004-10-29 10:17:04
Message-ID: 012301c4bda0$71f20540$5378dbc2 () tech01
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello,

For accounting_stop packet it's better to use Acct-Session-Time because for
a call that the same user do you can use this to seperate the calls. In this
way you can handle a lot of calls that one user do. All this if you want to
know about the calls one by one.


Kyriaki Gali,
IT Applications Specialist
Kinetix Tele.com Support Center,
Tel & Fax: +30 2310 256140
GSM: +30 6947 723737
http://www.kinetix.gr
e-mail: support@kinetix.gr
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roman Suzi" <rnd@onego.ru>
To: "Radius Free" <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: Advice needed (Acct-Session-Id vs. User-Name)


>
> Hi,
>
> I need an advice. One of my collegues suggested to drop User-Name
> for accounting purposes to avoid realm clashes (when CISCO
> drops realms in some cases).
>
> He suggests to store Acct-Session-Id at authorisation and
> then restore User-Name at accounting stop event to make accounting.
>
> He claims it's more accurate than to rely on User-Name.
>
> As this is completely novel idea, I'd liked to know community opinion.
> Thank you!
>
> Sincerely yours, Roman A.Suzi
> -- 
>  - Petrozavodsk - Karelia - Russia - mailto:rnd@onego.ru -
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]