[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeradius-devel
Subject:    Re: binding on IPv6
From:       Alan DeKok <aland () deployingradius ! com>
Date:       2008-01-11 9:50:01
Message-ID: 47873BC9.9060000 () deployingradius ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Stefan Winter wrote:
> A colleague of mine played around with netcat and FR and straced both. There 
> is one difference in the socket() call:
> 
> netcat, IPv4, UDP:
>   socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP) = 3
>   setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0

  Ah.  SO_REUSEADDR  means "allow multiple programs to listen on the
same address"

> The difference being:   socket(..., IPPROTO_UDP <-> IPPROTO_IP) (the 
> setsockopt looks harmless, but not sure).

  I don't think that's it.

> Why that would be a difference is not clear to me. A wild guess is that 
> SOCK_DGRAM+IPPROTO_IP binds to all datagram-based IP payload protocols, which 
> may be more than UDP, and that one of those non-UDP bindings clashes when 
> trying to bind, even to an IPv6 address. Weird.

  If netcat is listening on IP sockets, there are less issues with
conflicts.

  Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]