[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freeradius-devel
Subject:    Re: Conflict in attribute value for RFC 2868 dictionary
From:       Alan DeKok <aland () deployingradius ! com>
Date:       2007-02-12 12:33:12
Message-ID: 45D05E88.5040406 () deployingradius ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Geoffroy Arnoud wrote:
> I am wondering why the dictionary.rfc2868 isn't
> conform with RFC 2868.

  Weird.  Looking at CVS, the dictionary was created before the RFC, so
my suspicion is that it matches the drafts, but not the final document

> I think that the dictionary is broken, but updating it
> may have impact on existing deployements, using
> attribute values to set AVpairs.

  I think that's possible, but not likely.  Only the numbers 2,3, and 4
are wrong.  The higher numbers were added later, and are correct.  So
only people using X25, ATM, or Frame-Relay will be affected... except
that the NASes likely use the correct numbers, so they won't be using
the wrong values for 2..4.

> If required, I can post a patch.

  Please.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]