[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freenx-knx
Subject:    Re: [FreeNX-kNX] freenx is dead !
From:       "Durk Strooisma" <durk () kern ! nl>
Date:       2007-11-02 13:51:23
Message-ID: 33460.217.170.42.100.1194011483.squirrel () webmail ! kern ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

> If you really think that the location of a package (and my own
> experience has showed that having all in one place like /opt/ makes
> things much easier) is more important than bug fixes, stability of the
> software, implementation of new features, easy to install packages, if
> you think that the mere location is much more important than all of
> that, speak up now!
>
> Yes I am angry and yes I do know that that is not good, but I am
> absolutely fed up with this discussion.

Hi Fabian. Nothing in this discussion is critism to your (and !M's)
wonderful work. This more about the question "why". I assume you're talking
in general, but would like to make it clear that my comment wasn't meant to
be a judgement. I respect their choice.

Like I said, it's just preference. That many projects have decided
differently doesn't mean !M must do the same. It's just an example that the
"heavyness" of arguments is relative.

That's all... No worries.

Durk


________________________________________________________________
     Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
    Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX Wiki/FAQ:
  http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
         Don't forget to check the NX Knowledge Base:
                 http://www.nomachine.com/kb/ 

________________________________________________________________
       FreeNX-kNX mailing list --- FreeNX-kNX@kde.org
      https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
________________________________________________________________
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]