[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freenx-knx
Subject:    Re: [FreeNX-kNX] Some protocol questions
From:       "Fabian Franz" <FabianFranz () gmx ! de>
Date:       2007-02-21 16:40:33
Message-ID: 20070221164033.65410 () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

> > - FreeNX still pretends to be a 1.5.0 even though a 2.1.0 backend is
> used, due to protocol changes from 1.5.0 to 2.1.0, which I know nothing about.
> 
> BTW: Wasn't this speculated to be a change by NX purposely to manipulate
> the usage of freenx?

ROTFL, you made my day.

Uh, sure yes. We add a new feature to this TEXT based protocol, so that FreeNX can't \
be a 2.1.0 server ...

Uhm, yes ... Sure.

No, I rather think NoMachine cleaned up some interfaces and such the client sends \
partly other messages if FreeNX pretends to understand 2.1.0 protocol.

And well it is imho FreeNXs fault if it says it does understand 2.1.0 even though it \
is not customized to do that, yet ...

So, please let the paranoia aside.

cu

Fabian
________________________________________________________________
     Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
    Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX Wiki/FAQ:
  http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
         Don't forget to check the NX Knowledge Base:
                 http://www.nomachine.com/kb/ 

________________________________________________________________
       FreeNX-kNX mailing list --- FreeNX-kNX@kde.org
      https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
________________________________________________________________


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]