[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freenet-dev
Subject: Re: [Freenet-dev] encryption (was: Implementing your ideas)
From: Adam Langley <agl () linuxpower ! org>
Date: 2000-04-28 18:40:59
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Am I missing something, or is this not entirely a client issue with
> > no bearing on the protocol or nodes at all? Yes, "Storable.Encryption"
> > or something like it is a good way to implement this, and maybe we
> > should recommend that; but the existing nodes do exactly the right
> > thing already, which is nothing.
>
> Yes, that is true. But we develop clients here too, and even more importantly
> client standards.
>
What if a client *doesn't* encrypt it? Anyone could upload something nasty
to your server and it wouldn't be encrypted. Kindof defeats the point doesn't
it?
AGL
--
Whenever anyone says, "theoretically," they really mean, "not really."
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic