[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freedos-user
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
From: Chris <christopherbwilliams1990 () gmail ! com>
Date: 2019-10-13 19:33:43
Message-ID: 5da37ba3.1c69fb81.d67f3.125f () mx ! google ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Just thought that I would let you know that I truly despise your signature. Lol @dave
From: michael@robinson-west.com
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 1:57 PM
To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
October 13, 2019 9:23 AM, "Jon Brase" <jon.brase@gmail.com> wrote:
SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 \
entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to \
disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already have \
disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations.
-------- Original message --------
From: David Griffith <dave@661.org>
Date: 10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00)
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share?
I have a Virtualbox image I found at
https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 which seems to
have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host
Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on
FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users"
parameter (below) is removed.
I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution
has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find
now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems
unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1.
Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf:
[Dave]
comment = Dave's stuff
path = /home/dave/foobar
read only = no
guest ok = yes
browsable = yes
writable = yes
valid users = dave
--
David Griffith
dave@661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Known vulnerabilities or not, SMB1 is used by OPL for loading PS1/PS2 games over \
network from a SMB1 server. I'd like to know how to support SMB1 protocol or at least \
how to substitute SMB2 or later whether the environment be Dos or OPL.
-- Michael C. Robinson
[Attachment #5 (unknown)]
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" \
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" \
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" \
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type \
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 \
(filtered medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div \
class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Just thought that I would let you know that I \
truly despise your signature. Lol @dave</p><p \
class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div \
style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 \
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal \
style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a \
href="mailto:michael@robinson-west.com">michael@robinson-west.com</a><br><b>Sent: \
</b>Sunday, October 13, 2019 1:57 PM<br><b>To: </b><a \
href="mailto:freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net">Discussion and general questions \
about FreeDOS.</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and \
Samba</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal \
style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>October 13, 2019 9:23 AM, \
"Jon Brase" <<a \
href="mailto:jon.brase@gmail.com?to=%22Jon%20Brase%22%20%3cjon.brase@gmail.com%3e" \
target="_blank">jon.brase@gmail.com</a>> \
wrote:<br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p><blockquote \
style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>SMB1 has known \
vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 entirely for a while \
and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to disabling it by default. It \
is possible that various distros may already have disabled it in their default SAMBA \
configurations.<br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: David Griffith \
<<a href="mailto:dave@661.org" target="_blank">dave@661.org</a>><br>Date: \
10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00)<br>To: <a \
href="mailto:freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net" \
target="_blank">freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>Subject: [Freedos-user] \
FreeDOS and Samba<br><br><br>What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba \
file share?<br><br>I have a Virtualbox image I found at<br><a \
href="https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33" \
target="_blank">https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33</a> which \
seems to<br>have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the \
host<br>Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely \
on<br>FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid \
users"<br>parameter (below) is removed.<br><br>I managed to get this to work a \
few years ago and recall that the solution<br>has something to do with using SMB \
protocol 1. None of the guides I find<br>now for mounting a share from FreeDOS \
mention this and Samba now seems<br>unwilling to admit it knows anything about \
SMB1.<br><br>Here's what I have for the share in \
/etc/smb.conf:<br><br>[Dave]<br>comment = Dave's stuff<br>path = \
/home/dave/foobar<br>read only = no<br>guest ok = yes<br>browsable = yes<br>writable \
= yes<br>valid users = dave<br><br><br><br>--<br>David Griffith<br><a \
href="mailto:dave@661.org" target="_blank">dave@661.org</a><br><br>A: Because it \
fouls the order in which people normally read text.<br>Q: Why is top-posting such a \
bad thing?<br>A: Top-posting.<br>Q: What is the most annoying thing in \
e-mail?<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Freedos-user \
mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net" \
target="_blank">Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br><a \
href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user" \
target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user</a> \
<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Known vulnerabilities or not, \
SMB1 is used by OPL for loading PS1/PS2 games over network from a SMB1 server. I'd \
like to know how to support SMB1 protocol or at least how to substitute SMB2 or later \
whether the environment be Dos or OPL.<br><br>-- Michael C. \
Robinson<o:p></o:p></span></p><p \
class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic