[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freedesktop-xorg
Subject: Re: Why care about indirect rendering ?
From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy () gmail ! com>
Date: 2005-09-02 8:26:09
Message-ID: 194f6255050902012616f007aa () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi there,
> X uses a network protocol. While I love the network transparency and
> wouldn't lose it for anything it doesn't mean you want it when you're
> local. In fact you want as little as you reasonably can between the
> application and the video card. That's in part why I find this
> indirect-rendering centered discussion so strange.
This is something I also never really understood. X forces you to go
through the network protocol even for drawing also if you're local.
Windows allows to plug-in a network-layer if you need it (however far
less professional than X).
Sure, Unix Domain Sockets are highly optimized - but at least parsing
out all the trafic should be quite expensive? Or am I completly wrong?
lg Clemens
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic