[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xorg
Subject:    Re: New libXvMC wrapper.
From:       Adam Jackson <ajax () nwnk ! net>
Date:       2004-09-21 22:54:35
Message-ID: 200409211854.39949.ajax () nwnk ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


On Tuesday 21 September 2004 18:34, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, list!
>
> Anybody opposed to this going in it's current form? If not, it will be
> enabled for linux and gcc, where I know the -nostartfiles option will work.

Why do you need -nostartfiles?

As mentioned earlier, the XvMC protocol really should ask the server for the 
name of the client driver to load, the way DRI does.  But this is certainly 
better than requiring every XvMC client to know about every possible driver.

- ajax

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]