[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freedesktop-xorg
Subject: Re: [Xorg] Xinerama backward compatibility issues
From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb () shiman ! com>
Date: 2004-02-19 20:05:05
Message-ID: 403516F1.5090205 () shiman ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Egbert Eich wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith writes:
> > Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> > > That's correct, no attempt has been made -- so far -- to preserve BC at
> > > the wire protocol level. (Nobody has made the case that it needs to be,
> > > either. Not yet anyway.)
> >
> > 5 years of deploying software using the old interfaces and protocols means
> > we'd break a lot of interoperability if backwards compatibility wasn't there.
> > Deprecating them is good, removing them is not.
> >
I'll accept that as making the case that it ought to be.
> That would apply to the removal of the panoramiX requests from
> the wire protocol.
> I don't see the benefit of the rest of the changes.
> The lib API is more standard conform as the XineramaGetData() call
> now returns a status instead of a pointer to a list. The list is
> returned in one of its arguments.
> The XineramaActive() call just got a Window ID added - which I fail
> to understand.
Probably a good question for the xorg_arch list where, presumable, some
of the people who spec'd the new protocol can anser the question.
--
Kaleb
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic