[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xdg
Subject:    Re: Icon caching is unusable
From:       Kenneth Wimer <wimer () suse ! de>
Date:       2005-10-03 19:30:13
Message-ID: 20051003193013.GF27235 () suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

* Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com> [Oct 03. 2005 20:02]:
> On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:55 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 11:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> > > If you look at Fedora, this is handled in the %post hook of all packages
> > > that install icons. Installing an icon is a two-step process 
> > > 
> > > 1) copy the icon to the right directory
> > > 2) touch the toplevel theme directory
> > 
> > This is probably the most stupid idea I've heard of on the subject. If
> > you take care of a postinstall script, why do you only touch the
> > toplevel directory instead of generating the cache?
> > 
> > And of course, it doesn't take into account the fact that packages
> > currently don't do that.
> 
> I don't know what packages you are talking about, but Fedora packages
> take care to update the icon cache when installing icons.

What about icon sets which are not supplied in vendor specific
packaging??

-- 
Kenneth Wimer
-------------------------------------------------------------
Scheinbare Rechtschreibfehler beruhen auf einer individuellen
Rechtschreibreform

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]