[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xdg
Subject:    Re: menu-spec: Excluded items are Unllocated
From:       Mark McLoughlin <markmc () redhat ! com>
Date:       2005-03-21 10:29:00
Message-ID: 1111400941.18732.20.camel () blaa
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 23:36 +0100, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 17:09, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > 	I just went ahead and committed ...
> 
> I don't think your commit to test 2 is correct. Glines i not allocated 
> (excluded by PuzzleGame rule) and thus should show up in Others, shouldn't 
> it?

	No, that's what this whole thread was about - we changed the behaviour
so that items which match an <Include> rule but later match an <Exclude>
rule are still considered "allocated" for the purposes of
<OnlyUnallocated/>.

	So, e.g. we added

"
Note that an entry that is included in a menu but excluded again by a
later <Exclude> is still considered allocated (for the purposes of
<OnlyUnallocated>) even though that entry no longer appears in the
menu. 
"

	to the text of the spec.

Cheers,
Mark.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]