[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xcb
Subject:    Re: [Xcb] Splitting up xcb-util repository
From:       Gaetan Nadon <memsize () videotron ! ca>
Date:       2010-09-05 14:34:19
Message-ID: 1283697259.5935.32.camel () ubuntu
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]

[Attachment #4 (multipart/alternative)]


On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:50 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:

> I completely agree with  you on the fact that it's not  a problem at
> all
> to require  Autoconf >= 2.62 for  libxcb and xcb-util, and  that's why
> I
> have already  put this macro  in util-common-m4 repository  for
> xcb-util
> libraries  and as  soon as  I have  some time,  I will  do the  same
> for
> libxcb.


I have taken notes from the discussion here, which was not in vain. It's
the first time
in a year I hear someone coming loud and clear in favor of the
separation between 
development-git and distro-tarball build scenario. I agree with Vincent,
I am just not
in a position to impose it. On the other hand I can propose a more
dynamic plan
to upgrade the toolchain so it comes sooner rather than later.

Gaetan

[Attachment #7 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:50 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
    <TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">I completely agree with&nbsp; you on the fact that it's \
not&nbsp; a problem at all</FONT></TT><BR>  <TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">to \
require&nbsp; Autoconf &gt;= 2.62 for&nbsp; libxcb and xcb-util, and&nbsp; that's why \
I</FONT></TT><BR>  <TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">have already&nbsp; put this macro&nbsp; \
in util-common-m4 repository&nbsp; for xcb-util</FONT></TT><BR>  <TT><FONT \
COLOR="#1a1a1a">libraries&nbsp; and as&nbsp; soon as&nbsp; I have&nbsp; some \
time,&nbsp; I will&nbsp; do the&nbsp; same for</FONT></TT><BR>  <TT><FONT \
COLOR="#1a1a1a">libxcb.</FONT></TT><BR> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I have taken notes from the discussion here, which was not in vain. It's the first \
time<BR> in a year I hear someone coming loud and clear in favor of the separation \
between <BR> development-git and distro-tarball build scenario. I agree with Vincent, \
I am just not<BR> in a position to impose it. On the other hand I can propose a more \
dynamic plan<BR> to upgrade the toolchain so it comes sooner rather than later.<BR>
<BR>
Gaetan
</BODY>
</HTML>


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Xcb mailing list
Xcb@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic