[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xcb
Subject:    Re: [Xcb] XCB I/O mechanism - Native win32 port
From:       Jeetu Golani <jeetu.golani () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-04-03 4:24:19
Message-ID: 200804030942.19441.jeetu.golani () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Hey guys,

Thanks Jamey for clarifying quite a bit :)

For now what I've done is get the code to "build" for win32....not running 
perfectly yet. Am trying to deduce if the failure is at the 
threading/synchronization mechanism as we've been speaking here. Once I reach 
that point I'll take a call as to whether to rewrite or the next 
steps :)....will keep u posted.

>> I have no idea what might be efficient in Windows. Is anything? ;-)

I concur completely....I too am a linux guy but grave misfortune has fallen me 
and I have to walk the road of the dark ;)

Bye for now



On Wednesday 02 Apr 2008, Barton C Massey wrote:
> In message <20080402162555.GA31578@oh.minilop.net> you wrote:
> > (I think it's particularly unfortunate that the newer
> > alternative to "select" is actually named "poll"...)
>
> IIRC poll() was in System V in the late 1980s, and probably
> goes back to V7 Unix in the mid-1980s.  So "newer" is
> somewhat relative, here. :-)
>
> Thanks much for the detailed analysis!
>
>     Bart
> _______________________________________________
> Xcb mailing list
> Xcb@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb


_______________________________________________
Xcb mailing list
Xcb@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xcb
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]