[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-liboil
Subject:    [Liboil] x86 broken in CVS
From:       f8cfe () free ! fr (Stephane Fillod)
Date:       2005-12-13 14:40:03
Message-ID: 20051213224006.GZ4719 () charybde ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:22:52PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:12 +0100, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:26:33AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > However, the latest cvs update introduced a new regression:
> > 
> > OIL: ERROR ../../liboil/liboil/liboiltest.c 351: oil_test_check_impl(): function \
> >                 multiply_f32_sse_unroll2 wrote after area for parameter d
> > OIL: ERROR ../../liboil/liboil/liboiltest.c 368: oil_test_check_impl(): function \
> >                 multiply_f32_sse_unroll2 in class multiply_f32 failed check (0 > \
> >                 22) outside=1
> > OIL: ERROR ../../liboil/liboil/liboiltest.c 351: oil_test_check_impl(): function \
> >                 multiply_f32_sse wrote after area for parameter d
> > OIL: ERROR ../../liboil/liboil/liboiltest.c 368: oil_test_check_impl(): function \
> > multiply_f32_sse in class multiply_f32 failed check (0 > 22) outside=1
> 
> How latest?  I committed some fixes at:
> date: 2005/12/13 21:17:26;  author: anholt;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -0
> according to CVS.

This one is clean. Thanks.

> I'm working on some code so we can test alignment issues (which that
> commit was about) automatically from the testsuite.  It's kinda working
> already.

Sounds great, esp. when using SIMD extensions. make check is going to
take longer, but who cares with the gain in debugging facility.

-- 
Stephane


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]