[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-intel-gfx
Subject:    [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map
From:       ben () bwidawsk ! net (Ben Widawsky)
Date:       2011-08-13 0:59:12
Message-ID: 20110813005901.GA22606 () seagal
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:28:17PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:19:40 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking
> > > > maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot
> > > > this down before I waste more time :).
> > > 
> > > What's the planned usage?
> > 
> > It's supposed to speed up things like map_range_buffer which tend to do
> > write only operations and shouldn't have to do a blocking set domain for
> > write only actions (read only from GPU).
> 
> I think for write-only ARB_mbr we want to be using GTT mappings, not CPU
> mappings.

I'm also planning to do this for GTT mappings, but that was harder and I
thought this might also be of some benefit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20110812/83b0732a/attachment.sig>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]