[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-dbus
Subject:    Re: ignoring a process' last words: SIGPIPE ...
From:       Marcin =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98Qrczak=E2=80=99?= Kowalczyk <qrczak () knm ! org ! pl>
Date:       2008-03-28 7:40:18
Message-ID: 1206690018.2255.4.camel () qrnik
[Download RAW message or body]

Dnia 28-03-2008, Pt o godzinie 01:58 +0000, Michael Meeks pisze:

> Clearly if we used a single Watch (& hence poll record) for both read &
> write the code would be cleaner, simpler & more efficient wrt. handling
> this case ( and less invasive: down to ~1 new line instead of ~30).

But then it would be impossible to enable and disable both ends
independently.

Or is it valid to change watch flags during its life?

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

_______________________________________________
dbus mailing list
dbus@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]