[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freedesktop-dbus
Subject: Re: ATSPI over D-Bus (was Re: [Accessibility] Re:
From: Rob Taylor <rob.taylor () codethink ! co ! uk>
Date: 2007-12-13 10:27:57
Message-ID: 4761092D.7000307 () codethink ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Rob Taylor wrote:
>>> Let's remember that DCOP was implemented in a very short period of
>>> time, and was dead simple - MUCH less complex than dbus is - and
>>> people used it heavily and successfully for lots of real
>>> functionality.
>> And KDE never wrote a sucessful accessibility framework with DCOP.
>
> The way you phrase it, it seems like DCOP is responsible for it. It's not.
> There was no accessibility framework like AT-SPI at all, nor any work to
> create it AFAIK.
>
> However, parts of an accessibility framework, including the text-to-speech
> interface, were written and even used DCOP.
Sorry, I was a little tired when I wrote that! I simply mean that the
argument 'DCOP was sufficient for KDE' doesn't really apply in this case.
Thanks,
Rob
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dbus mailing list
> dbus@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
--
Rob Taylor, Codethink Ltd. - http://codethink.co.uk
_______________________________________________
dbus mailing list
dbus@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic