[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-standards
Subject:    Re: standards/50889: NULL defined as 0 instead of (void *)0
From:       Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh () freebsd ! org>
Date:       2003-04-23 7:01:18
[Download RAW message or body]

Synopsis: NULL defined as 0 instead of (void *)0

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: schweikh
State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 22 23:56:12 PDT 2003
State-Changed-Why: 
#define NULL 0 is ISO 9899 compliant. A discussion if a change to
#define NULL ((void*)0) would be beneficial has not shown a strong case
either way. There are bugs that can be covered/uncovered with both definitions.
In accordance with Newton's First Law, NULL is left as is.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=50889
_______________________________________________
freebsd-standards@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-standards-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic