[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-questions
Subject:    Re: Question (fwd)
From:       Michael Sierchio <kudzu () tenebras ! com>
Date:       2020-04-09 2:46:55
Message-ID: CAHu1Y71A-GEZP8Y9NasK6XiM=KDtbb+J7i2E14u6iHtcHiswNg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 7:43 PM Dewayne Geraghty <
dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote:

> On 9/04/2020 12:11 pm, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> > For a number of reasons I tend to create monolithic kernels, and prevent
> > loading kernel modules after boot.
> >
> > I'm running 11.3-STABLE
> >
> > in the kernel LINT file I see
> >
> > options         GEOM_LINUX_LVM
> >
> > options         COMPAT_LINUXKPI
> >
> > options         COMPAT_LINUX32
> >
> >
> > but COMPAT_LINUX no longer is a recognized symbol. ....  Hmmm...
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:44 PM Kevin P. Neal <kpn@neutralgood.org>
> wrote:
>
> I just ran make LINT on my FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #0 r359640M: Mon Apr  6
> which has, on i386:
>
> LINT:options    GEOM_LINUX_LVM
> LINT:options    COMPAT_LINUXKPI
> LINT:options    COMPAT_LINUX
>
> while the amd64 version has:
> LINT:options    GEOM_LINUX_LVM
> LINT:options    COMPAT_LINUXKPI
> LINT:options    COMPAT_LINUX32
>
> which explains things.
>

I'm not yet enlightened, Sensei. ;-)  Yes, as you correctly infer, I am
running amd64 kernel.  But... are those kernel options sufficient (along
with the right userland pkg) to run 64 bit Linux binaries?

– M


-- 

"Well," Brahmā said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred."

- The Mahābhārata
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]