[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-ports
Subject:    Re: redports - should I rename the updated distfile (tarball)?
From:       Wesley Shields <wxs () FreeBSD ! org>
Date:       2012-09-27 20:43:35
Message-ID: 20120927204335.GA10592 () atarininja ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:55:51PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> redports.org is good, thank you to whoever worked on it.
> 
> One question: the upstream for my port is non-existent,
> so rather then patch it, I'm updating the code itself.
> I then create a new tarball. It seems redports doesn't
> update the tarball every time I request a build.
> So it seems I have to update the version in Makefile
> each time and create a tarball with this new number.
> Is that so?

I can't comment on the relation of this to redports as I've never used
it myself. I can state that if you're modifying the source and creating
a new tarball you should bump the PORTVERSION in the port (and
consequently in your distfile too) and also make sure distinfo is
correct. This will help to distinguish your changed tarball from the
original.

-- WXS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]