[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-ports
Subject:    Re: Suggestions for an interim perl upgrade?
From:       Christopher Nehren <apeiron () comcast ! net>
Date:       2004-02-27 20:14:05
Message-ID: 20040227201405.GA96896 () prophecy ! dyndns ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


>I have a production server that needs badbly to have it's perl
>installation upgraded to perl 5.8.3 right now and I'd like to know if
>there's any best practice to do the upgrade without conflicting with
>it's port (and the portupgrade tool), when released.

I filed a PR more than a month ago (ports/61444) which provides an
upgrade for lang/perl5.8. It's still awaiting approval (hint, hint). 
I've been running it since I submitted it without a single issue
(WITH_THREADS, to boot!). It's not official, but I've been using it
non-stop for over a month.

>Another concern regards to upgrading various perl dependent (also p5-*)
>ports with this manual perl 5.8.3 installation using portupgrade: does
>this work 100%? And when the official perl port is released, will the
>portupgrade be able to correctly handle the future upgrades?

I followed the normal upgrade procedure after applying my patch and
installing 5.8.3. Again, no problems, but this isn't official (yet)
either. 

Speaking of: can someone _please_ take a look at ports/61444? I've CC'd 
tobez previously (see message ID 
20040220183953.GA977@prophecy.dyndns.org), but haven't received a
response yet.

--
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated".  -- Ken Thompson
-
Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.
-
Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s).

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]