[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freebsd-net
Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE?
From: paul () originative ! co ! uk
Date: 1999-01-21 11:56:20
[Download RAW message or body]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan [mailto:danny@sydney.alpha.net.au]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 2:50 AM
> To: paul@originative.co.uk
> Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl; opsys@open-systems.net; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE?
>
>
> Hi, I have worked with IIS for some time now and I have
> experienced many
> problems. Like the blue screen of death after u deployed ur
> webserver ..
>
> Plus many more ture stories how NT screwed up some mission critcal
> projects
>
> If I was you Paul I would completely forget about Nt
Ehh? I've never, ever said anything in favour of NT! Please, don't
besmirch my character in such a manner :-)
You've removed all the context but if this is in reference to the
proposal to move a site from NT to FreeBSD I just suggested that the
content of the site be checked first before pushing his boss to adopt
FreeBSD since if the content uses a lot of IIS features the Web
applications themselves will need rewriting, it won't just be a simple
matter of changing web server.
I never meant to imply that moving to FreeBSD wouldn't be a good idea,
it just might be more work than they realise. Beneficial in the long
wrong though for sure but probably a lot harder to justify to
management.
Paul.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic