[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-jail
Subject:    starting jails in the background & dependencies
From:       Alexander () Leidinger ! net (Alexander Leidinger)
Date:       2010-01-25 8:26:22
Message-ID: 20100125092601.29577741bjgbjjsw () webmail ! leidinger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Quoting Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> (from Mon, 25 Jan 2010  
07:44:10 +0100):

>
>
>> Note that I haven't tsted it, but I don't see any errors in the patch.
>>
>>> ---snip---
>
>> --
>> Simon L. Nielsen
>>
>
> Snipping a whole lot of data...
>
> Thanks Simon, I will try to get to that as soon as possible, Alexander:
> please feel free to do it earlier if possible, my internet access is
> "limited" (or at least commit capabilities).

I have this running as I posted it. I can confirm that the  
jail_parallel_start=no works as expected. I didn't try the YES case. I  
am not happy about my man page change. Anyone with a better  
description? We do not start the jails in parallel, we start the jails  
serially in the background. I think the variable name is ok, as we  
start the jails in parallel to the rest of the system start scripts. I  
do not want to limit the wording so that it prevents to really start  
the jails in parallel instead of serially in the background, while  
still telling that it is done in parallel to the rest of the scripts.

If I get some time today, I will think about a better wording (if I do  
not get something from the people reading this before).

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
There's nothing remarkable about it.  All one has to do is hit the right
keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
		-- J. S. Bach

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]