[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-hackers
Subject:    =?utf-8?B?UmU6IEZyZWVCU0QgZmluYW5jaW5n?=
From:       "=?utf-8?Q?Saifi=20Khan?=" <saifi.khan () nishan ! io>
Date:       2022-11-06 8:34:31
Message-ID: 20221106083431.21465.qmail () s411 ! sureserver ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> -------Original Message-------
> From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
> 
> And no Juniper listed. I remember some time ago FreeBSD switched to clang
> because of Juniper pressure that said they have constant law problems
> because of GNU general communist licence. Which was logical.
> 
> but now i read that Juniper have "alternative" JunOS based on linux. Is
> GNU general communist licence no longer a problem for Juniper?
> 

@Wojciech GNU General Public License (GPLv2) is a free software license. You may be \
frustrated but GPL has consistently delivered !

Your choice of biased words is matched by your lack of understanding of co-opetition \
in technology markets, Linux kernel being the exemplar.

NetBSD project was pressured by Wasabi. FreeBSD project was pressured by Juniper (as \
you write) and many other corps. LLVM-CLang was alll pumped up by Apple etc. Does \
that mean when waved dollars each project becomes a dancing queen (aka exploited) ?

warm regards
Saifi.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]