[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-hackers
Subject:    Re: Replacing BIND with unbound
From:       "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg () evilcode ! net>
Date:       2012-08-31 17:05:35
Message-ID: CANY-Wm_YrJ2k4JCHK4oJ4wHS_h6g5JasrSD35hqYQwb6e2rGzg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 11:08 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>> Neither importing ldns nor removing BIND is going to have any effect on
>>> the stub resolver library in libc.
>>
>> Yes it does as if we are not carefull, we'll neither have a _proper_
>> validating caching resolver but 4 different resolver libraries 3 of
>> which needing crypto and only 2 with a well known support plan and
>> only 2 with the same interface in base.
>

<snip>

Just a data point. DragonFly removed BIND from base in favor of
ldns/drill in June of 2010, there has not been any quantifiable
fallout. We did not bring in unbound and there are no plans to do so.

Sam
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]