[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freebsd-hackers
Subject: Re: UNIX domain sockets on nullfs still broken?
From: Vlad Galu <dudu () dudu ! ro>
Date: 2009-11-30 15:21:03
Message-ID: ad79ad6b0911300721x50c35917n659d53e74145a4b1 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, <xorquewasp@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote:
>> > 76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL, /tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 }
>> > 76030 initial thread NAMI "/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0"
>> > 76030 initial thread RET connect -1 errno 61 Connection refused
>>
>> I would expect to see this result from the jail since it's obviously a
>> Bad Idea, but does it work from the same (host) machine without the jail
>> in between (i.e. just the nullfs, no jails)?
>
> Hm, yes, you're right. It does work without a jail involved.
>
> What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
> is unix domain sockets?
For redirecting a connection to a UNIX socket to a remote host:port,
there's net/unix2tcp. Perhaps you can patch it to go the other way
around as well?
>
> xw
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic