[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freebsd-current
Subject: Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.
From: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist () src ! cx>
Date: 2010-12-25 7:12:28
Message-ID: AANLkTi=TZcyDAbWAR0y1B5=RUqLr3mEyfr-aRspKLmzw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
>>> I have one comment though. I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to
>>> syscall_freebsd.ko.
>> I've renamed it for consistency with other systrace provider variants.
>> I can change it back.
>
> I think that I would prefer this.
> If only for POLA reasons.
Done. New patch is here:
https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101224.patch.gz
By the way, the patch contains several files generated by "make
sysent". If the patch is applied to sources other than
stable/8@216436, then "make sysent" should be re-done in
amd64/linux32, i386/linux and compat/freebsd32.
--Artem
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic