[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-arch
Subject:    Re: INTR_POLARITY_BOTH_EDGES?
From:       John Baldwin <jhb () FreeBSD ! org>
Date:       2020-07-01 20:48:03
Message-ID: 7c16a5a7-ab5a-6aa7-df15-171ea5308d2d () FreeBSD ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 6/30/20 1:22 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> What do you think about adding this to intr_polarity ?
> I think that it's useful for two reasons:
> - support for GPIO interrupts of that kind (GPIO_INTR_EDGE_BOTH)
> - symmetry with ACPI's ACPI_ACTIVE_BOTH (which probably exists for GPIO as well)
> This new polarity is to be valid only with INTR_TRIGGER_EDGE as the name (and
> sanity) implies.
> 
> By the way, the name is a open for bikeshedding.

Sounds ok to me.

-- 
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]