[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freebsd-amd64
Subject:    Is 5.2.1-R-amd64 a reasonable (viable) platform?
From:       Adriaan de Groot <adridg () sci ! kun ! nl>
Date:       2004-07-24 18:41:26
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.44.0407242033020.22867-100000 () wn4 ! sci ! kun ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

The KDE-FreeBSD team is gearing up for more packaging runs, and we're
wondering what to build them for for amd64. Kris K does -CURRENT packages,
so we don't need to worry about them. For i386, we do 4.10-R, 4-STABLE,
and 5.2.1-R as well, just to serve as many folks as possible. Which
releases are viable for amd64? 4-X is out; 5.2.1-R is left as a candidate,
but is it possible that there might be folks actually running that
somewhere? I doubt it, since the lack of cvsup and - february it was - I
guess the stack and redzone mess there was then _seem_ to make it a
less-than-viable platform. What do you think?

(More to the point, if you're running 5.2.1-R and not -CURRENT on amd64,
would you want new KDE packages?)

_______________________________________________
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]