[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fossil-users
Subject:    Re: [fossil-users] how to maintain a set of patches?
From:       Remigiusz Modrzejewski <lrem () maxnet ! org ! pl>
Date:       2012-02-26 19:18:03
Message-ID: 1ED56471-72BD-4171-9937-41F603964327 () maxnet ! org ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]


On Feb 26, 2012, at 15:00 , Leo Razoumov wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:48, Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
> > > (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?
> > 
> > 
> > If i'm not sorely mistaken, fossil was indeed originally designed for
> > exactly one purpose: managing the sqlite repo.
> > 
> 
> GIT was originally designed as a BitKeeper replacement for linux
> kernel. Then the scope broadens...

Well, IIRC Mercurial was even more narrow, originally created to keep only some \
subsystem of the kernel ;)


Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]