[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fop-user
Subject:    Re: Need help to get Arabic working with FOP
From:       Glenn Adams <glenn () skynav ! com>
Date:       2012-11-09 1:19:33
Message-ID: CACQ=j+fQZdHRoD_+owjyPPzbb-mQ95cyzJbp529O7r-mGBCuEg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Brian Hansen <greencoppermine@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have been using FOP 1.0, but never mind, I have just fallin in love
> with wkhtmltopdf - the static version produces links inside the PDF
> file and the result is so much better than FOP.
>
> Thanks, but I wont be using FOP any longer I think the result from
> wkhtmltopdf is much better, even with the problems with Arabic fonts.
>

It can't be better since FOP 1.0 never supported Arabic. You are comparing
apples and oranges. If you wish to try FOP with Arabic, use a version that
supports it. Otherwise, you are wasting our time. Whatever.

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Brian Hansen <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:greencoppermine@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">greencoppermine@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">

I have been using FOP 1.0, but never mind, I have just fallin in love<br>
with wkhtmltopdf - the static version produces links inside the PDF<br>
file and the result is so much better than FOP.<br>
<br>
Thanks, but I wont be using FOP any longer I think the result from<br>
wkhtmltopdf is much better, even with the problems with Arabic \
fonts.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It can&#39;t be better since FOP 1.0 never \
supported Arabic. You are comparing apples and oranges. If you wish to try FOP with \
Arabic, use a version that supports it. Otherwise, you are wasting our time. \
Whatever.</div>

<div><br></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]