[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fop-user
Subject:    Re: fop 0.91: keep-with-previous
From:       Jeremias Maerki <dev () jeremias-maerki ! ch>
Date:       2006-01-23 21:40:58
Message-ID: 20060123223346.56FF.DEV () jeremias-maerki ! ch
[Download RAW message or body]

It's not on my high-priority list and as far as I can remember from when
I implemented the layout manager code for tables, this is a non-trivial
task. So unless someone else does it or my priorities change, I guess
the next release will still have this limitation.

Did you understand my suggestion about removing the blind table (keep
work-around)?

On 23.01.2006 21:36:48 Stefan Pflumm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thank's for the help, but i use "keep-with-previous" in other parts of my document \
> which couldn't replaced easely with keep-with-next. So will "keep-with-previous" \
> for table rows reimplemented in the next beta version? 
> fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org schrieb am 17.01.06 23:01:12:
> 
> That's a known issue documented in the release notes:
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.91+beta
> 
> I can see that you're only using the table here because of the
> work-around for keeps in 0.20.5. You can actually remove that table for
> 0.91beta now because keeps work on normal blocks, even
> keep-with-previous. keep-with-previous just doesn't work inside tables
> and lists, yet. The other option is to use keep-with-next instead of
> keep-with-previous if possible. And it looks like it is possible in your
> case.


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]