[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fop-dev
Subject:    Re: Google Summer of Code
From:       mehdi houshmand <med1985 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-03-05 16:18:12
Message-ID: CALmsGz3LmRk21HUCMMbRAdcd6E2hTsEBApixNQYFRoN5ZfRU=w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Alex/Glenn,

Yeah that's a fair point, I think this may be a textbook case of
Freudian projection, so my apologies if those weren't your intentions
Glenn.

The problem is, I don't have a great deal of experience in the Layout
Engine and I really have no grounds to put a proposal together. I've
put forward the projects that I know about and think are interesting.
If you want to put a project proposal forward please do, if no one
else steps forward as a mentor and an applicant takes an interest,
I'll make the effort to learn the code.

Mehdi


On 5 March 2012 15:48, Alexios Giotis <alex.giotis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think that Glenn's idea is that bad. FOP's open bugzilla issues are not \
> only bugs, they also show what are the areas that FOP needs to be improved. If we \
> start from the beginning, then 
> > 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files
> 
> is a real, very interesting issue and the solution is not to increase the Java heap \
> size. There are workarounds such as caching objects but a good solution might be \
> deeper in FOP's  layout engine. What about checking or implementing Donald Knuth's \
> first-fit or best-fit algorithms ? In theory, it would allow to free FO tree and \
> layout manager objects after the end of every page. 
> There was a recent discussion about this, see
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/3ejv4opwcceipfpl?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Exmlgraphics%2Efop-users+total+best+fit
>  
> Of course there will be drawbacks, FOP is complex (more complex than it should be \
> in my opinion, cleanup / modularization would help) and this is not a simple task. 
> 
> Alex Giotis
> 
> 
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 4:49 PM, mehdi houshmand wrote:
> 
> > Haha, if only it were that simple... The projects have to be
> > interesting and fulfilling and at least bordering on fun. They also
> > have to be an opportunity to learn and encourage opensource
> > development. There's little fun to be had fixing bugs hidden in the
> > depths of FOPs fairly difficult to delve-in code base, also - probably
> > more importantly - I can't imagine it would serve as encouragement.
> > 
> > Mehdi
> > 
> > On 5 March 2012 14:36, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > > I would suggest whittling down the fop bug list, starting from the
> > > beginning.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:35 AM, mehdi houshmand <med1985@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Because of the overwhelming popularity of this idea, I've created a
> > > > link on the Wiki
> > > > (http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/GoogleSummerOfCode2012) for
> > > > the GSoC proposals.
> > > > 
> > > > On a serious note, this is literally work for free. Google pays the
> > > > bills and I'm happy to mentor any applicants and do the admin, all you
> > > > have to do is provide ideas for projects. If you have a wish list or a
> > > > list of TODOs that you think a newbie could do for a summer project (I
> > > > do appreciate that's quite a big caveat), now's your opportunity.
> > > > 
> > > > Mehdi
> > > > 
> > > > On 1 March 2012 16:26, mehdi houshmand <med1985@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Glenn,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The GSoC doesn't relate directly to the ASF or FOP directly, however,
> > > > > putting a few FOP projects as proposals would be a good way to get
> > > > > some new interest into the project. I think it would be good for us as
> > > > > we benefit from any work done, and it helps whomever does the work
> > > > > learn the various skills that we as a community can impart upon them.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've included a link to the GSoC below, but if you do some research,
> > > > > there's plenty of information out there.
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://code.google.com/soc/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mehdi
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 1 March 2012 16:13, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > > > > > could you provide a link to the "Google Summer of Code Project"? how
> > > > > > does it
> > > > > > relate to ASF and FOP activities?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:50 AM, mehdi houshmand <med1985@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > We're thinking of submitting a proposal or two to the Google Summer of
> > > > > > > Code project and wanted to get some input from the community on ideas.
> > > > > > > Once we've got a few proposals I'll create a wiki page and put all the
> > > > > > > ideas on there, but for now I just wanted to gauge interest.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In terms of mentoring, I'm happy to be a mentor and I've registered as
> > > > > > > one and if any other committers fancy the job, do register, the more
> > > > > > > the merrier. The deadline is 9th March, so that doesn't give us long
> > > > > > > to bounce around ideas, but here are a few I was thinking:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > - There have been recent discussions between Jeremias, myself and
> > > > > > > others about extracting the Fonts packages into their own library. I
> > > > > > > think this would be a great idea for a project because essentially it
> > > > > > > only involves a few, well defined specifications (TTF, Type1 etc) and
> > > > > > > doesn't expose the person to too much complexity. The way I'd suggest
> > > > > > > this to be done, is by re-writing rather than porting, that way it
> > > > > > > gives the person much more flexibility and also the current code would
> > > > > > > give them good tips and tricks on how to deal with parsing fonts.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > - TTF in AFP. I know we still have the TrueTypeInPostScript branch
> > > > > > > flying around, and however much I'd like to fob that onto someone
> > > > > > > else, I don't think it's fair to do so. I have no idea how long this
> > > > > > > project would take, but I think FOP could really benefit from it.
> > > > > > > Currently we're forcing users to use AFP fonts for AFP documents, a
> > > > > > > lot of which are archaic and use EBCDIC, for those of you who haven't
> > > > > > > been exposed to EBCDIC, count yourself lucky.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > There may be something to do with PCL?? I'm not at all familiar with
> > > > > > > the format, but I do remember discussions about upgrading to a newer
> > > > > > > PCL standard? I'd be happy to acquaint myself with the format if
> > > > > > > there's interest in the idea.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hopefully we can get a proposal together in time.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Mehdi
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]