[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       flightgear-devel
Subject:    Re: [Flightgear-devel] A couple of random oddities
From:       "Vivian Meazza" <vivian.meazza () lineone ! net>
Date:       2011-06-30 12:47:49
Message-ID: 1D7FAF31DD2F4AF09F930136D1AD9ED2 () MAIN
[Download RAW message or body]

Thorsten wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From:.i.renk@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.renk@jyu.fi]
> Sent: 30 June 2011 13:21
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A couple of random oddities
> 
> > Further research indicates that the F1A, modeled here was NOT capable of
> > M2.0 at 36000ft. M1.9 seem more likely. Moreover, due to structural and
> > stability problems the F1A was operationally limited to M1.7 or
> > approximately 700KIAS. We have pushed a small change in Mach drag to
> > model this better. Ron will look at the Mach stability issue a bit
> later.
> 
> I plead guilty - yes, it seems I overlooked the mark...
> 
> Still, I think some discrepancy remains, and thanks to everyone for
> looking into it! The Lightning really is a great model.
> 

We think it's pretty close now in Git - apart from stability - see what you
think. But it was well worth revisiting, so thanks for the heads-up.

Vivian



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]