[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       flac-dev
Subject:    Re: [flac-dev] about apodization functions
From:       Olivier Tristan <o.tristan () uvi ! net>
Date:       2015-02-06 18:54:29
Message-ID: CA+ujzvUQZPO8Tjwy9MWA1-3L43m=Z2qT2wPryCRrpJ75ZaY4vQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Well I'm not testing on music material but on a single piano note of 1 min
length
and went from a 0.156 to a 0.148 ratio

Thanks for the answer.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Op 06-02-15 om 10:03 schreef Olivier Tristan:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Does having multiple apodization functions change something to the
> > decoding process
> > or does it only apply to the encoding process ?
>
> It is only applicable to encoding, it is probably best to see it
> as more 'analysation passes'. I wonder how you got to 10% gain
> though, usually gains are more in the order or 0.1% or something
> like that.
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>



-- 
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Well I&#39;m not testing on music material but on a single piano note \
of 1 min length<div>and went from a 0.156 to a 0.148 \
ratio</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the answer.</div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:47 PM, \
Martijn van Beurden <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mvanb1@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">mvanb1@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">Op 06-02-15 om 10:03 schreef Olivier Tristan:<br> <span \
class="">&gt; Hi Guys,<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; Does having multiple apodization functions change something to the<br>
&gt; decoding process<br>
&gt; or does it only apply to the encoding process ?<br>
<br>
</span>It is only applicable to encoding, it is probably best to see it<br>
as more &#39;analysation passes&#39;. I wonder how you got to 10% gain<br>
though, usually gains are more in the order or 0.1% or something<br>
like that.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div \
class="h5">_______________________________________________<br> flac-dev mailing \
list<br> <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev" \
target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div \
class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div \
style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;float:left"><span \
style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px">Olivier \
Tristan</span><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px">Research \
&amp; Development</div><div \
style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px"><a \
href="http://www.uvi.net" \
target="_blank">www.uvi.net</a></div></div></div></div></div></div> </div>



_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]