[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       flac-dev
Subject:    Re: [flac-dev] flac-1.3.1pre1
From:       Jan Stary <hans () stare ! cz>
Date:       2014-11-27 14:56:09
Message-ID: 20141127145609.GA15880 () www ! stare ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]

On Nov 26 17:24:38, mle+la@mega-nerd.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
> 
> > Ha! If the final
> > 
> > 	printf("%c", byte[bx]);
> > 
> > is changed to
> > 
> > 	printf("%d", byte[bx]);
> > 
> > the results produced by mawk and awk are identical.
> > So the diference must be just that mawk printf's "%c" differently.
> 
> Which version of mawk are you using? I've got 1.3.3 and with your
> proposed change, test_replaygain.sh fails.

mawk-1.3.4.20140914

But I don't have any proposed change;
in particular, I do not suggest to replace printf("%c", byte[bx]);
with printf("%d", byte[bx]); I just observe that the two sequences
of samples are identical as sequences of integers - they just differ
in the way they are printed out with AWK's printf("%c") as opposed
to MAWK's printf("%c").

I'll try to find time and look into it; this shouldn't be hard,
we just want to generate a sine wave portably.

	Jan

_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]