[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: firewalls-gc
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Virus Scan....
From: harley () icrf ! icnet ! uk
Date: 1997-01-29 12:39:49
[Download RAW message or body]
> > * Alert the recipient that the attachment/file etc. hasn't been scanned
> > for viruses and trust them to handle it appropriately. In which case
> > you need to make a very clear policy statement on what 'appropriately'
> > means (which may vary considerably according to circumstances).
>
> This is probably the best compromise. Perhaps some warning mail to an
> administrator as well.
>
That's the option that repels me least, too. Some sites might consider
making an administrator responsible for a case by case decision on
whether to forward or maybe take more direct action. Certainly some
sort of monitoring is a good idea.
--
David Harley \ | / alt.comp.virus FAQ
D.Harley@icrf.icnet.uk \ | / & Anti-Virus Web Page
Support & Security Analyst \ | / Folk London On-Line gig-list
Imperial Cancer Research Fund ____\|/____ http://webworlds.co.uk/dharley/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic