[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fink-devel
Subject:    Re: [Fink-devel] Package Description length
From:       "Peter O'Gorman" <peter () pogma ! com>
Date:       2005-01-24 15:03:34
Message-ID: 41F50E46.4070009 () pogma ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Henninger wrote:
| I was just wondering... why is the package description warning length
| different for -v validate than it is without -v?  It doesn't seem like -v
| is meant to be "more restrictive", but..?  On a related note, I let a
| package on through because it had a fine length under validate, but it was
| complained about with -v validate.  Is that ok?

It is, I belive, a method of sorting out the "important" warnings from those
that are not going to cause injury to anyone. The more verbose you ask for,
the more warnings you see. No warnings at any verbosity level is best. If
you can't make the description shorter, pretend you never saw the warning :)

Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQfUORbiDAg3OZTLPAQKLgwQAhyHsKMN6Yxl17ECuH6teslk7zLD8uzw4
FeX1baPFSSdnewTSY2GyfQ2JHGo2TWlXmdeazHhyEkVCNYuXclZCHNq0vhSsRSlG
A/qO4rzAqEiBsqbPWtyap1zHDduXwSwyJMRpt+DsUZZLj0pyLGzCrhqgJ/4q7hwj
CzOK1XV8e0Q=
=nTYo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]